Siemens Sharenet Case Study Analysis

  • 1.

    Armenakis, A.A., Bedeian, A.G.: Organizational change: a review of theory and research in the 1990s. Journal of Management 25(3), 293–315 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

  • 2.

    Benbasat, I., Goldstein, D.K., Mead, M.: The case research strategy in studies of information systems. MIS Quarterly 11(3), 369–386 (1987)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

  • 3.

    Darke, P., Shanks, G., Broadbent, M.: Successfully completing case study research: combining rigour, relevance and pragmatism. Information Systems Journal 8(4), 273–289 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

  • 4.

    Davenport, T.H., De Long, D.W., Beers, M.C.: Successful knowledge management projects. Sloan Management Review 39(2), 43–57 (1998)Google Scholar

  • 5.

    Dubé, L., Paré, G.: Rigor in information systems positivist case research. MIS Quarterly 27(4), 597–635 (2003)Google Scholar

  • 6.

    Galliers, R.D.: Towards the integration of e-business, knowledge management and policy considerations within an information systems strategy framework. Journal of Strategic Information Systems 8(3), 229–234 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

  • 7.

    Ginzberg, M.J.: Key recurrent issues in the MIS implementation process. MIS Quarterly 5(2), 47–59 (1981)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

  • 8.

    Grover, V., Davenport, T.H.: General perspectives on knowledge management: fostering a research agenda. Journal of Management Information Systems 18(1), 5–21 (2001)Google Scholar

  • 9.

    Hatch, M.J.: They dynamics of organizational culture. Academy of Management Review 18(4), 657–693 (1993)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

  • 10.

    Heier, H., Borgman, H.P., Manuth, A.: Siemens: expanding the knowledge management system ShareNet to research and development: Siemens: expanding the knowledge management system ShareNet to research & development. Journal of Cases on Information Technology 7(1), 92–110 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

  • 11.

    Jin, K.G., Franz, C.R.: Obstacle coping during systems implementation. Information & Management 11(2), 65–75 (1986)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

  • 12.

    Keen, P.G.W., Bronsema, G.S., Zuboff, S.: Implementing common systems: one organization’s experience. Systems, Objectives, Solutions 2(2), 125–142 (1982)Google Scholar

  • 13.

    King, W.R., Marks, P.V., McCoy, S.: The most important issues in knowledge management: what can KM do for corporate memory, management thinking, and IS responsibility, as well as for overall business performance? Communications of the ACM 45(9), 93–97 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

  • 14.

    Krovi, R.: Identifying the causes of resistance to IS implementation: a change theory perspective. Information & Management 25(6), 327–335 (1993)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

  • 15.

    Lee, A.S.: A scientific methodology for MIS case studies. MIS Quarterly 13(1), 33–52 (1989)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

  • 16.

    Leidner, D.: Information technology and organizational culture. In: Galliers, R.D., Leidner, D.E., Baker, B.S.H. (eds.) Strategic information management: challenges and strategies in managing information systems, 2nd edn., pp. 523–550. Butterworth-Heinemann, Oxford (1999)Google Scholar

  • 17.

    Leonard, D.: Wellsprings of knowledge: building and sustaining the sources of innovation. Harvard Business School Press, Boston (1998)Google Scholar

  • 18.

    Lewin, K.: Group decision and social change. In: Newcomb, T.N., Hartley, E.L. (eds.) Readings in social psychology, pp. 329–340. Holt, Rinehart & Winston, Troy (1947)Google Scholar

  • 19.

    Lucas, H.C.: Implementation: the key to successful information systems. Columbia University Press, New York Guildford (1981)Google Scholar

  • 20.

    Lucas, H.C., Plimpton, R.B.: Technological consulting in a grass roots action oriented organization. Sloan Management Review 14(1), 17–36 (1972)Google Scholar

  • 21.

    Macredie, R.D., Sandom, C.: IT-enabled change: evaluating an improvisational perspective. European Journal of Information Systems 8(4), 247–259 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

  • 22.

    McElroy, M.W.: Using knowledge management to sustain innovation: moving toward second generation knowledge management. Knowledge Management Review 3(4), 34–37 (2000)MathSciNetGoogle Scholar

  • 23.

    Meso, P., Smith, R.: A resource-based view of organizational knowledge management systems. Journal of Knowledge Management 4(3), 224–234 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

  • 24.

    Myers, M.D.: Qualitative research in information systems. MIS Quarterly 21(2), 241–242 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

  • 25.

    Orlikowski, W.J., Hofman, J.D.: An improvisational model for change management: the case of groupware technologies. Sloan Management Review 38(2), 11–21 (1997)Google Scholar

  • 26.

    Pettigrew, A.M.: Longitudinal field research on change: theory and practices. Organization Science 1(3), 267–292 (1990)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

  • 27.

    Ruggles, R.: The state of notion: knowledge management in practice. California Management Review 40(3), 80–89 (1998)Google Scholar

  • 28.

    Schein, E.H.: Organizational culture and leadership, 2nd edn. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco (1992)Google Scholar

  • 29.

    Schein, E.H.: The corporate culture survival guide: sense and nonsense about culture change. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco (1999)Google Scholar

  • 30.

    Seeley, C.: Change management: a base for knowledge-sharing. Knowledge Management Review 3(4), 24–29 (2000)MathSciNetGoogle Scholar

  • 31.

    Spector, B.: From bogged down to fired up: inspiring organizational change. Sloan Management Review 30(4), 29–34 (1989)Google Scholar

  • 32.

    Srinivasan, A., Davis, J.G.: A reassessment of implementation process models. Interfaces 17(3), 64–71 (1987)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

  • 33.

    Stein, E.W., Zwass, V.: Actualizing organizational memory with information systems. Information Systems Research 6(2), 85–117 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

  • 34.

    Storey, J., Barnett, E.: Knowledge management initiatives: learning from failure. Journal of Knowledge Management 4(2), 145–156 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

  • 35.

    Thomas, J.C., Kellogg, W.A., Erickson, T.: The knowledge management puzzle: human and social factors in knowledge management. IBM Systems Journal 40(4), 863–884 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

  • 36.

    Tushman, M.L., O’Reilly, C.A.: Ambidextrous organizations: managing evolutionary and revolutionary change. California Management Review 38(4), 8–17 (1996)Google Scholar

  • 37.

    Tyran, C.K., George, J.F.: The implementation of expert systems: a survey of successful implementations. Database 24(1), 5–15 (1993)Google Scholar

  • 38.

    Urban, G.L.: Building models for decision makers. Interfaces 4(3), 1–11 (1974)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

  • 39.

    Wilson, R.: Don’t make culture another item on the KM checklist. Knowledge Management Review 3(4), 8–9 (2000)Google Scholar

  • 40.

    Yin, R.K.: Case study research: design and methods, 2nd edn. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks (1994)Google Scholar

  • 41.

    Zand, D.E., Sorensen, R.E.: Theory of change and the effective use of management science. Administrative Science Quarterly 20(4), 532–545 (1975)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

  • Case: Siemens Ag Global Development Strategy

    Siemens is a huge 155 year old international $77 billion German based companionship operating from side to side 16 big business units by means of one of the world's main infrastructure, electronic and engineering corporation and 1200 fully merges supplementaries in additional than 190 countries, which are sprint by 484,000 workers.

    All Siemens businesses are part of a medium organization that combines a central strategic compass reading with decentralized business and local responsibilities. As worldwide entrepreneurs, Siemens' Operating Groups are independently accountable for their universal businesses. Each Group has its own Executive Management, which is accountable for organization Group commerce in accordance with corporation policies distinct by the Managing Board of Siemens AG. The Operating Groups decide how their resources will be second-hand. They develop their possess strategies, manage their possess assets and generate pay in their respective marketplace segments.

    Siemens: Vision, Strategy & Principles.

    According to the expert analysis a company likes siemens with so a group of people, production sites, products and associates all over the world - needs a solid base of lawful and ethical principles.

    Siemens: Corporate Principle"Siemens is a productive innovator and a strong actor in the global commerce stadium. The information, skills and dedication of our populace are crucial to our sustained achievement as a corporation."Source: Siemens Corporate Responsibility Report 20021.We strengthen our CUSTOMERS - to keep them spirited.

    2.We push INNOVATION - to form the prospect.

    3.We enhance corporation VALUE - to open new opportunities.

    4.We empower our PEOPLE - to achieve world-class performance. Our workers are the key to our success. We work jointly as a global network of knowledge and knowledge. Our corporate civilization is defined by variety, by open conversation and mutual admiration, and by clear goals and important leadership.

    5.We embrace business RESPONSIBILITY- to advance civilization.

    Although every Group of Siemens determines their possess strategies base on these principles. Siemens One is novel company-wide strategy to improve marketplace diffusion and drive enlargement in new fields by ornamental cooperation across the whole association.

    "Excellent Employees Guarantee Success"Siemens needs the most excellent and the brightest populace in order to attain outstanding business consequences. Siemens want to be the company of option for extremely capable applicants and offer them exceptional long-term possible by emphasising on staffing, training, sustained education, incentive and development opportunity by means of in the business.

    Key strategies.

    1.Service Provision: To give staffing programmes responsiveness to the require of the department in some business unit of any...

    Loading: Checking Spelling

    0%

    Read more

    Report on Knowledge Management Strategy

    1062 words - 4 pages Introduction From the last decade, the discipline of the Knowledge Management (KM) has a long foot development, which was established since 1991.(Sven C. Voelpel and Han, 2005) As the weight of the investment to KM system increasing, the researches of management to knowledge get more complex and integrate. The purpose of this report is to identify the current position on the KM of Siemens, and the recent KM effort within the industry....

    PEST analysis of Siemens

    716 words - 3 pages Siemens AG PESTLE AnalysisPolitical FactorsSiemens AG will be subject to legislation in any country within which they are operating. With the head office in Germany they are subject to German and European corporate law. In the U.K Siemens must obey English legislation specific to that market. For example The

    CROSS CULTURAL COMMUNICATION IN INDONESIA AND UNITED STATES

    3258 words - 13 pages On 2007, Volkswagen AG financial performances hit its record sales and earnings, selling more than 6 million car in a year and accumulating approximately €113,808,000 sales revenue (Volkswagen Annual Report, 2008). Martin Winterkorn, Volkswagen's Chairman of the Board Management realised that Volkswagen secret of success is thanks to the continuous effort towards new knowledge creation and innovation process. Gurteen (1998) stated that...

    Leadership Ethics and Culture

    1624 words - 6 pages Introduction The purpose of this paper is to examine leadership ethical views in different cultural and organizational setting. The researcher will compare and contrast leadership ethics in different cultural and organizational settings. Finally, the researcher will provide a conclusion. Leadership Ethical Views in Different Cultural and Organizational Setting According to Razzano and Nelson (2008) Siemens AG which is a transnational...

    Haier Case

    1614 words - 6 pages Haier Group (Haier), a government owned company, manufactures household appliances and electronic products in over 15,100 different specifications under 96 categories. Haier products are sold in over 100 countries around the globe. Haier Group primarily operates in Asia, Europe, Oceania and North America. The company is headquartered in Shandong, China and employs about 50,000 people.In the following analysis, a brief discussion of the...

    Marketing strategy of Samsung mobile phone.

    9275 words - 37 pages The global communications industry has been changing during the past few years, and quite dramatically. Wireless communication, as a result, proves to be a hot area for telecom suppliers. Accordingly, the demand for handset products, from businesses to consumers continues to rise. The question is how handset manufacturers have fit their global marketing strategies to win widespread acceptance as competition intensifies. Thus, this analysis...

    Hyflux: Expansion into India

    4011 words - 16 pages Hyflux's Expansion Strategy in India Executive SummaryHyflux, with its cutting edge technologies and strong operational capabilities, is a leading provider of integrated water treatment systems with operations in China, Middle East, South East Asia and recently, India. With a huge growing population, increased economic...

    Organisational Behavior (OB)

    3187 words - 13 pages Introduction Stephen Robbins and A.J.B UBRIN think organisational behavior (OB) includes three interrelated influence and contact area of research: the behavior of the individual level, the group level and the organisational level behavior. This report will research a variety of organisational behavior theories.The following report will start with comparing and contrasting different the organisational structure and culture within Siemens to...

    Nokia Business Level Strategy

    903 words - 4 pages Think about a company (preferably that we are all familiar with) which applied one of the corporate-level strategies in the past. Describe the situation clearly that the other students get a picture of the situation.Create a new thread on the discussion board. Title the thread with something that helps others on the discussion board know the general content of your contribution to the discussion.Answer the following questions in...

    Case Study: Siemens ShareNet: Building a Knowledge Network

    1302 words - 5 pages AbstractIn response to industry demands, Siemens underwent a major corporate restructuring in 1998; among other changes, a new department was established, the ICN or Information Communications Network. The ICN created ShareNet, an information network readily accessible through any web browser, to take advantage of the knowledge gained from the company's 156 years of experience and the current talents the it has to offer, and make these...

    Polyethylene: Manufacturing Cycle and Environmental Impact

    1142 words - 5 pages Manufacturing Cycle and Environmental Impact The most common form of polyethylene is petroleum based or olefins based; as before mentioned polyethylene compounds have a wide commercial applicability and are made from non-renewable resources (Harding, Dennis, von Blottnitz, Harrison, & S.T.L., 2007). Its manufacturing processes are regarded as energy intensive and release significant amount of CO2 and heat into the atmosphere (Broderick, 2008)....

    Comments

    Leave a Reply

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *