i am preparing for ielts, my writing is bad, could u hepl me check for grammar, sentence structures and ideas, thanks so much
By punishing murderers with death penalty, society is also guilt of committing murder. Therefore, life in prison is a better punishment for murderers.
To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement
In the 18 century BC, death penalty was used at first time, and at that time, people listed detail how a person could be put to death if she or he did not obey the rules. Until now, this kind of punishment is still used in most of countries in the world. Some people think that this kind of punishment is too inhumane, so government should abolish the capital punishment. Personally, I definitely agree with this opinion for several reasons below.
First of all, there is no one has the right to take other one's life away. People are born by God, and God is only person who has this right. Human beings should not kill human beings. Even if criminals have committed horrible crimes, the government does not have the right to execute them. Taking those people into prison is a good solution; because this is a deserved punishment for their crimes and this kind of punishment is much more humane than capital punishment. This type of punishment is strong enough to make scare in criminals' minds.
Furthermore, most criminals have committed crimes when they cannot control themselves or they cannot think about the consequences of their own actions. In fact, many people have committed crimes when they are angry. For example, I read a story about a woman who killed her children by herself. She did love her children, however her husband left her and lived with other woman and did not care of his wife and children. She though that she would kill herself, she wondered that who would look after her children when she was away, and she decided to dump down river with her children. Unfortunately, she was saved, while her children died by herself. It will be inhumane if government uses death penalty for her.
However, other people believe that using capital punishment ensures safety for societies. In fact, we can see that the number of crimes is rising in some countries although many criminals are punished by death penalty and this kind of punishment cannot stop crimes.
In conclusion, I strongly believe that death penalty cannot bring safety for societies like people want. This punishment is not only an inhumane one, but also cannot prevent committing of criminals. Life time imprisonment is a better alternative for capital punishment.
good morning EF_Sean
i think when a person kill another, it is inhumane.
Why didn't she put them up for adoption? Or ask a friend to look after them? Also, wouldn't this woman be able to mount an insanity defense? That is, this isn't the sort of case that would normally provoke the death penalty anyway.
because, she decided to do that when she was in bad condition, she could make any conscious decision as well as the consequence of her decision.
Life Imprisonment without Parole vs. the Death Penalty
When a heinous crime is committed more than likely the perpetrator will be sentenced to life in prison without parole or the death penalty. In many cases the death penalty is the final verdict but defense for the inmate may work toward a life without parole sentence. Overall it depends on the crime committed and whether or not the criminal really knew what they were doing. The court will decide the outcome based on evidence leading up to the crime committed that made the suspect eligible for either sentence.
Life in prison without parole is given to someone that commits a crime that is practically unforgivable. A person may take the life of another person, or commit a number of serious crimes that add up to a lot of years in prison. For instance, committing fraud, stealing from the government or robbing a number of banks could lead to decades in prison. A person could get a sentence of 50 or 60 years in prison. If they are middle aged when the crime occurred this is practically a life sentence since you would be in there until you die if you are not eligible for parole.
The death penalty can be given to someone who takes the life of another in ways unforgivable. A suspect could have committed multiple murders or it was a decision the jury felt would justify the crime committed. This decision is controversial since many people do not support the death penalty. A suspect may be remorseful for what they did, but feel they should not die for it. They would rather serve life in prison. But, many prison establishments rather have the inmate die in order to save on costs. The death penalty is a ruling that is commonly appealed several times until the death of the inmate occurs. In some cases it can be overturned but not without a hard fight.
Being locked up for life can be something hard to deal with. Many suspects end up taking their own lives because they can’t stand the idea of being in solitary confinement. More people are looking into ways to get rid of the death penalty or at least gain more support to have such rulings overturned. For others it is a matter of understanding why someone did what they did. After all, you have to pay for the crime someway even if it doesn’t make sense.