Essay On Pointlessness Of War And Weddings

FEATURE: White Weddings in War-time Ireland

By Alyson Gray

Weddings today are big business. As of 2016 the global wedding industry was worth an estimated €275 billion, while it is believed that on average Irish couples spend €25,000 on their big day. Having recently gotten engaged, I was quick to learn how much both costs and expectations build up, and it’s easy to see how couples suddenly end up spending a small fortune on their wedding day. A century ago, this was not quite the case, especially as Ireland, along with the rest of Europe, was caught up in the Great War. But despite the unending sacrifices that were needed for the sake of the conflict, weddings still endured. 

The traditional format for weddings in early 20th century Ireland consisted of a morning ceremony, followed by a wedding breakfast. The vast majority of weddings lacked the pomp and circumstance we associate with them today. Three-day binges and lavish honeymoons were not par for the course, nor did the majority of weddings involve what we now consider as ‘afters’. 

A taxi driven by a gas balloon, used for a wedding party in August 1917. (Image: Manchester Guardian, History of War, 1917. Full collection available in the National Library of Ireland)

If excess was not the norm, the onset of war helped to curb the impulses of anyone with a predilection towards extravagance. In January 1917, the Leitrim Observer published a notice appealing for quieter weddings in view of the war-time food shortages. It was remarked upon that ‘while wedding breakfasts have been almost entirely abandoned as the result of the scarcity of eggs, many ancient and costly customs such as pelting the bride with toast racks and bathing the bridegroom in champagne still continue unabated’.

References to pelting brides and bathing grooms is worthy of analysis in its own right, yet here it is sufficient to point out the emphasis that was placed on a modesty that all wedding planners were expected to observe - including the daughter of the British Prime Minister. Violet Asquith, daughter of Herbert, was married to Maurice Bonham Carter in 1915 in what, in ordinary times, might have been expected to have been an important society wedding. But these were not ordinary times. In December 1915, the Freeman’s Journal reported that owing to the war, the plan was for the wedding to ‘be as unceremonious as possible’. It didn’t quite turn out that way. The couple had neither a reception nor a ‘wedding breakfast’, but their high social profile – and that of their parents – attracted large crowds of on-lookers to the church on the day of the wedding.

A cartoon from Puck Magazine depicting a couple shopping on their honeymoon.

The majority of the wedding ceremonies that were reported in newspapers involved a church ceremony in the company of the bride and groom’s friends and family. Following the ceremony, it was commonplace for either the bride’s parents – sometimes even the priest – to host a reception or wedding breakfast, after which the couple would leave either by motorcar or train to their honeymoon destination, usually one within Ireland.
Of course, those weddings that warranted newspaper coverage tended to involve those from wealthier, more upper middle-class, backgrounds and it was not unusual for weddings to be used as a platform for the display of social status that found expression in everything from the attire of the bride to the wedding presents given and received.

Central to the whole occasion was the bride’s wedding dress. Then, as now, the dress invited comment and came at a cost. Just how much was revealed in a London court case involving a jilted bride who claimed that she had already spent £100 (nearly €6,000 today) on a trousseau – or bridal wear – when her prospective groom broke his promise of marriage. References to white dresses abound in the reporting of weddings, nowhere more than in the pages of Ireland’s society magazine, Irish Life, where, on one occasion, the bride provided a sketch of a dress to accompany the announcement of her forthcoming wedding.

A sketch of Miss Lane's wedding dress which appeared in Irish Life. (Image: Irish Life, August 1917. Full collection available in the National Library of Ireland)

The white wedding dress had come to prominence after Queen Victoria wore it to her wedding in 1840; up until then, it was common for brides to wear any variety of colours. White, while usually considered a symbol of purity, was also a symbol of wealth, mainly due to the limitations of laundering techniques when it came to white garments. These practices caught on among more affluent brides after 1840, but middle to lower class brides were slower to take up on these traditions. By 1917, however, white was everywhere. When Mollie Daly married Major Simmonds, in May 1917, Irish Life reported that she wore a ‘picturesque gown of ivory charmeuse relieved by touches of jade green, and her tulle veil was bordered by exquisite antique Irish lace’. For Ira Josephine Hetreed, who wed Lieut. Alan Skinner in Tramore, Co. Waterford on 10 May 1917, her fashion of choice was a ‘pretty gown of white crepe de Chine trimmed with silver lace, and her tulle veil from a chaplet of orange blossoms’. And for Dorothea Morse, who married Captain A. Aylmer Cummins in April 1917, her dress was, as Irish Life put it, a ‘lovely bridal robe of Georgette and satin with silver embroidery, and a long veil of Limerick lace’.

A selection of group wedding photos from Irish Life. On the top right are Ira Josephine Hetreed and Lieut Alan Skinner who wed in Tramore on 10 May 1917. (Images: Irish Life, 1917. Full collection available at the National Library of Ireland)

Then there was the marriage of Katie Fitzpatrick and James Gilheany in September 1917, an event reported in the Anglo-Celt which gushed over the bride’s dove-coloured gabardine costume, with a white felt hat and gloves to match. She also, for what it’s worth, carried a bouquet of ‘choice’ flowers.

Then there were the gifts. The Fitzpatrick-Gilheany wedding took place in Belturbet, Co. Cavan and the couple were lavished with gifts that were ‘numerous and costly’ and which included a substantial selection of silver cutlery and kitchen appliances, a gold brooch, a gold signet ring, a cheque, a set of furs and a silver tea set. And that’s just some of what the Anglo-Celt reported. The length of the list and their expense spoke volumes for the material wealth of the guests in attendance. Moreover, given the inclusion of such detail in the press the assumption can also be made that the couple were keen to publicise their good fortune to others. According to the 1911 census report Miss Fitzpatrick’s father was a ‘Victualler’, which indicates he owned a business in the town and the groom Mr Gilheany was employed as a national school teacher in the area, the wedding was considered relatively important in the locality.

Not all weddings ran smoothly, of course. There could often be occasions of minor controversy and farce. In September 1917, for example, the wedding of a young couple in Tyrone was scuppered by the objections of the bride’s relatives. When the bride failed to appear in the church, the concerned groom sent her a telegram wondering what had happened. The telegram was intercepted by the relatives, who refused to let the bride leave to marry. The bride then set out on a bicycle to reach her groom but was captured by another cyclist. She was then taken to Rossnowlagh in Co. Donegal, but from here managed to send a secret message to her prospective husband. In an act of romantic high drama, he travelled to her during the night and the bride escaped through the window. They were married the next morning.

Other scenarios such as weddings being interrupted because the groom had deserted from the front were also reported. In October 1917, Private Alfred Reid was prevented from celebrating his wedding after he was taken into custody to be handed over to his regiment as a deserter. A similar incident took place in Birmingham, and was reported in the Leitrim Observer. On being apprehended, the soldier exclaimed: “Can’t you let me spend one day with my wife?” His request was denied.

In London, meanwhile, would-be groom Lieut. Frederick Melville Kennedy was sued in March 1917 by his would-be bride,Miss Marion Hallett for damages for an alleged breach of promise of marriage. The wedding had been due to take place in June 1915, and according to the evidence provided to the court, presents had already began to be delivered to the couple when the groom changed his mind. He claimed later in writing that his financial position did not warrant him marrying as previously arranged. Miss Hallett claimed she had already spent £100 on a trousseau, but the question of marriage was ultimately left open until the war was over.

Soldiers and their brides. Left to right - Capt. Dagg and Corisande Valentine at their wedding in Wicklow, Major Sir Christopher Nixon and Miss L. Clery at their wedding in Limerick, and Capt. Graham de Burgh and Molly Lamb at their wedding in Wexford. (Images: Irish Life, 1917. Full collection available at the National Library of Ireland)

Writing on the effects of the war on Britain, the poet Philip Larkin observed in his poem, MCMXIV:

‘The thousands of marriages,
Lasting a little while longer;
Never such innocence again’. 

There is a poignant truth in those lines. For many a war-time marriage was short-lived and many a bride became a widow much sooner than they ever expected to, or were supposed to. Such tragedy struck Lt James Stronge and Winifred Alexander, whose engagement was announced in the Irish Independent in November 1916. They were both in their mid-20s and the former was already away at the war, having enlisted in the Royal Irish Fusiliers in October 1914. The wedding eventually took place on 10 July 1917, but the marriage was short-lived. Just a month later, on 16 August 1917, Stronge was killed at Ypres, France.

Alyson Gray is a researcher at Century Ireland.

No matter what new technologies develop, singular photos always seem to provide the lasting images that sum up wars on the whole. Matthew Brady's shots at Antietam brought the horror and carnage of the Civil War home, the V-J Day "Kiss" captured the euphoria and relief of the end of the "good war," and the terrifying "Napalm Girl" displayed the barbarity of modern weaponry unleashed on a civilian populace.

The most iconic photo of the Iraq War -- and by extension the war in Afghanistan -- is the "Marlboro Marine" shot. It's the now iconic 2004 still of a grubby, weary soldier named James Blake Miller taking a smoke break during the brutal assault on Fallujah. It's an amazing image, a young man caked in blood and dirt, dazed, but thankful to be alive. The one thing about the "Marlboro Marine" though, to me at least, it that it's more about the grit, determination heroism and fear of soldiers of all wars, not just the current conflicts. It will live on forever, but it just as easily represents Marne, Guadalcanal or Gettysburg.

Last week, the wife and I went to check out the Whitney Biennial, the 75th installment of the latest in contemporary art. Typically, it featured the sublime, the ridiculous and the generally inexplicable.

One exhibit, however, stood apart from the rest and made the entire Biennial seem small and unimportant by comparison. Nina Berman's photo essay "Marine Wedding" is a series of unstaged photos of sergeant Ty Ziegel, then 24, back home as he prepares for his wedding to his high school sweetheart Renee Klein, then 21. Ziegel survived a suicide bomber attack in Iraq, but was severely disfigured and needed 50 reconstructive operations. The exhibit's notes are few, but it does explain that, "A plastic dome, with holes where his ears and nose used to be, replaced his shattered skull."

The entire collection is gut wrenching, and the wedding portrait in particular is heart-breaking almost beyond description. Some of the photos show Ziegel adapting to his new reality in a way that at least gives us hope, but the wedding picture says otherwise. In it, Ziegel's decked out in his Marine best, looking down upon his beautiful bride, but Klein's gaze tells us her mind is elsewhere. It should be the one of the happiest days of his life, but all I could see was sadness.

It pains me to say this, and I sincerely mean no disrespect, but there is no way to look at the photo without wishing it to be some sort of Beauty & the Beast fantasy come to life. But life isn't like the movies; happy endings are few and far between where war is concerned. The wounded marine's living nightmare doesn't even offer the cathartic Grand Guignol release of an Eli Roth splatter film or a Goya painting.

This is Ty Ziegel's life. He and Renee separated after a few months and are now divorced.

Perhaps the harshest reality of Berman's incredible photo exhibit is knowing that Ziegel probably wouldn't have survived any of America's previous conflicts. The incredible advancements in battlefield medicine have given our soldiers an incredible survival rate of over 90 percent. And in what is either a gift from God, or the cruelest joke of the Devil, Ziegel's body below the neck (and minus a left arm) seems to be in working order. The collection gives the appearance that he will live for a long time.

A week later, staring at the photo gives me pangs of guilt about my own happy wedding memories. Unfounded, yes, but once a Catholic always a Catholic. Tomorrow is Good Friday and although I no longer believe in much these days, Berman's essay had me thinking about what this life on Earth means. As a kid, I always terrified by nails through hands and feet, a bloody crown of thorns, and the torturous death of the man on the cross. The hope and joy of the resurrection never washed away the pain and agony of the crucifixion... in my mind anyway.

If you can't get to New York City, I would ask that you take a few minutes to look through "Marine Wedding." If nothing else, it's a stark reminder that these wars have consequences and many of our sons and daughters are having their lives permanently altered in faraway lands.

It's not like the words of some silly blogger matter a whit -- nor do I assume anything about the man's life -- but for what it's worth, these photos will haunt me for a long time. To our troops, their families, Renee Klein, and Marine sergeant Ty Ziegel, I would like to offer one thing this Easter weekend:

Peace be with you.

(Ed Note: Anyone seeking to help seriously wounded veterans should contact Fisherhouse.org, which provided the Ziegels with housing support.)

Follow Patrick Sauer on Twitter: www.twitter.com/pjsauer

Comments

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *